··

Please wait...

 
Blog

Flight

flight-cover-image
Emily L.C. Shepard
Swansea University, UK
 
 

Moving in a moving medium: new perspectives on flight

A special issue of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.
 
Edited by
Steven J. Portugal and Emily L.C. Shepard.
 
View contents

Cycling into even a small breeze can be surprisingly hard work. The stronger the wind gets, the harder you have to work against it. If your daily commute involved cycling against the wind, it wouldn’t be surprising if you ended up picking routes that were sheltered from the wind.

This is just one of the realities that flying animals face all the time – whether it is windy, gusty, whether the air is rising or sinking, the air is hardly ever still.

Last year, Steve Portugal and I edited a special issue of Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, examining how flying animals respond to the challenges – and opportunities – that come with moving in a medium that is, itself, on the move.

wiki_commons-swift_2-apus_apus_-barcelona_spain-8_1Whether it is swifts migrating over the Sahara ( Åkesson et al) or swallows hawking for insects over a field, flying animals have become adept at using airflows to their advantage. In this issue, Warrick et al show that swallows can extract energy from wind-gradients near the ground – a strategy that reduces the costs of flight when they are foraging. This is particularly exciting because albatrosses (the Procellariiformes in fact – or tube-noses) have always been celebrated as the only group to do this through dynamic soaring. This goes to show that such strategies of harvesting energy from the air are more widespread than people initially thought.

Our own paper (Shepard, Williamson & Windsor) shows that gulls alter their flight paths to take advantage of updraughts associated with buildings. The issue of gulls in cities is an interesting one, as populations of Herring Gulls and Lesser Black-backed Gulls are declining in many rural areas but expanding in urban locations. Buildings provide ample updraughts under a range of conditions, which might be one of the factors making urban areas profitable for soaring birds. However, urban airflows are very complex and we also show that that gulls appear to modify their fine-scale trajectories in a manner that affords them greater flight control in the face of gusts. So exploiting airflows in urban areas is not without its risks.

Insects are very slow fliers and therefore have the least ability to work against air currents. But how do they know which way a particular air current is flowing? It is not at all easy to tell, given that insects can fly so high above the ground they can’t see which way it is moving beneath them and the air itself is invisible. Nonetheless, we know insects can pick out airflows that can help take them to their desired destination on migration. Reynolds et al suggest that insects experience jerks from turbulent air currents, which are minimised when insects fly downwind – so the smoother the ride, the more likely they are flying with the flow, rather than against it. This, combined with an internal compass, is what they need to migrate between their breeding and feeding areas.

wiki_vulture_griffonHowever, it is not purely about how animals alter their flight paths. One of the striking messages to come out of the issue is just how finely controlled airspeed is in birds – speed is crucial as it is closely linked to energy expenditure, though the optimal airspeed that animals should fly is influenced by a whole range of factors. Three studies in this issue show just how sophisticated airspeed selection is in animals: Hedenström and Åkesson show speed varies with the wind, group size, and body mass in terns, Taylor et al show that eagles glide faster when gliding into a headwind, and Harel et al show that decisions on flight speed in Griffon Vultures vary according to whether or not the bird is flying to a known destination.

Tools from radar to animal-attached loggers have been crucial in helping us understand how animals respond to the movements of the air – as a range of articles in the issue show. But as far as we have come, many more questions lie ahead. We know very little about how animals respond to fine-scale turbulence, for example, although some exciting experimental work is underway (as discussed by Ortega-Jimenez et al in this issue). As we understand more about the way individuals respond to airflows (whether the responses are biomechanical, physiological or behavioural), this will help ecologists understand when and how airflows affect population processes.
 

References

Åkesson, S., Bianco, G. & Hedenström, A. 2016. Research article: Negotiating an ecological barrier: crossing the Sahara in relation to winds by common swifts. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371 20150397; DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0397 VIEW
Harel, R., Duriez, O., Spiegel, O., Fluor, J., Horvitz, N., Getz, W.M., Bouten, W., Sarrazin, F., Hatzofe, O. & Nathan, R. 2016. Research article: Decision-making by a soaring bird: time, energy and risk considerations at different spatio-temporal scales. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371 20150397; DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0397. VIEW
Hedenström, A. & Åkesson, S. 2016. Research article: Ecology of tern flight in relation to wind, topography and aerodynamic theory. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371 20150396; DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0396. VIEW
Reynolds, A.M., Reynolds, D.R., Sane, S.P., Hu, G. & Chapman, J.W. 2016 Review article: Orientation in high-flying migrant insects in relation to flows: mechanisms and strategies. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371 20150392; DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0392. VIEW
Shepard, E.L.C., Williamson, C. & Windsor, S.P. 2016. Research article: Fine-scale flight strategies of gulls in urban airflows indicate risk and reward in city living. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371 20150394; DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0394. VIEW
Taylor, G.K., Reynolds, K.V. & Thomas, A.L.R. 2016. Research article: Soaring energetics and glide performance in a moving atmosphere. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371 20150398; DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0398. VIEW

shepard

About the author

Emily Shepard is a senior lecturer in the Department of Biosciences, Swansea University. She started working on birds during her PhD, which was on the foraging ecology of imperial cormorants. She then transferred her loyalties from the sea to the air, studying the movements of Andean condors. Emily now has a foot in both camps, with projects examining the flight behaviour of both vultures and seabirds, and how aspects of the ecology of both groups are influenced by airflows.
 
Follow Emily on Twitter @ELCShepard

Image credits

From top:
Arctic Tern, Farne Islands, UK, © Harry Read www.harryreadphotography.co.uk
Common Swift | pau.artigas | CC-BY-SA-2.0 | via Wikimedia Commons
Griffon Vulture | MinoZig | CC-Zero | via Wikimedia Commons

Blog posts express the views of the individual author(s) and not those of the BOU.

If you want to write about your research in #theBOUblog, then please see here.
 
The BOU has received payment from the Royal Society to advertise ‘Moving in a moving medium: new perspectives on flight’ a special issue of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B in their 10 January 2017 e-newsletter (see here). This blog is linked to that special issue of Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B and the related Twitter event #flight on 10 January 2017 run by the BOU via their account @IBIS_journal. No payment was received for this blog post or Twitter event, and no payment was made by the BOU to the author of this blog or any other party in relation to this blog post or Twitter event.
 
 
Find us on . . . Twitter | Facebook | Instagram
 

Blog posts express the views of the individual author(s) and not those of the BOU.

If you want to write about your research in #theBOUblog, then please see here.
 

Find us on . . .

Twitter | Facebook | Instagram

£0.000 items
Loading...