An Australian shorebird breaks the rules on moult
For most species moult occurs after breeding, but for Australia's Hooded Plovers it begins at the start of their breeding season.
Wildlife and Conservation Biology at Deakin University in Victoria, Australia
Prolonged and flexible primary moult overlaps extensively with breeding in beach-nesting Hooded Plovers Thinornis rubricollis. Rogers, K.G, Rogers, D.I. & Weston, M.A. IBIS 156: 840-849. DOI: 10.1111/ibi.12184
Birds face some big energetic challenges in their lives including moulting (the process in which they regularly replace all their plumage), breeding, and for some species, migration. It is not surprising that annual cycles of birds have evolved to avoid overlap of these energetically demanding but essential processes. Studies of moult from birds throughout the world have shown that for most non-migratory birds, moult occurs after breeding – so pervasive is this pattern that the term ‘post-breeding moult’ is commonly used by ornithologists. Overlap between the end of breeding and start of moult is not uncommon in birds, but complete overlap of breeding and moult is rare. Flight feather moult is usually sandwiched between energetically costly periods (e.g. breeding, migration or the onset of winter), so it is usually a fairly discrete event lasting ~1-3 months. Extended primary moults have been reported mainly in species that are very large (and thus have to grow a lot of feather material) or those that live in arid regions.
However, as we captured and studied resident Hooded Plovers Thinornis rubricollis, on temperate ocean beaches of south-eastern Australia, these ‘rules’ began to unravel. The Hooded Plover population started moulting their primary feathers (the main flight feathers on the wing) about the time breeding began, and moult continued throughout the extended but seasonal breeding period. Many individual birds of both sexes were moulting and breeding at the same time. So, we had a regular, seasonal overlap between breeding and moulting!
We examined how the plovers achieved this overlap. Firstly, the timing of primary moult was estimated and the unusually extended duration (170 days for females; 210 days for males), was apparently the longest recorded for shorebirds – so moult was slow. Females moulted significantly faster than males, and showed less extensive overlap of moult and breeding. Examination of the sequence of feather replacement (i.e. the possible patterns of feather loss and regrowth that progressed moult in a wing) indicated that moults fell on one of two alternative sequences. The first (“fast”) had more feathers growing at the same time, the second (“slow”) had fewer feathers growing at any one time. The sequences also overlapped in places, suggesting birds could change between “fast” and “slow” sequences, akin to changing gears in a car (higher gears produce more speed but burn more fuel per unit time). Indeed, some birds were found to have “changed gears” of moult during a breeding season. So, moult was flexible! Again, this seems new for birds, with the few species studied apparently generally using a single sequence of feather replacement.
Nobody yet knows why Hooded Plovers overlap breeding and moult, but it is likely to be an adaptation to living on ocean beaches on temperate southern oceans. It might be that there are severe food shortages during the reasonably mild winter non-breeding period, perhaps making moult impossible at that time. Perhaps more importantly, breeding failure is very common in these exposed, linear habitats, especially as Hooded Plovers only use passive nest and brood defence. They routinely need to make multiple breeding attempts in a season to have reasonable chance of successfully raising young. Energetic demands presumably vary though the breeding season as a result, especially in females which bear the energetic burden of egg production. Slow and flexible moult may enable Hooded Plovers to adjust their energetic investment in moult at any one time, so that they can invest energy in replacement clutches as needed. Detailed studies of moult and breeding are uncommon outside the northern temperate zones, and may reveal more species that ‘break the rules’, perhaps including more species which seasonally overlap moult and breeding.
About the authors
Mike Weston lectures in Wildlife and Conservation Biology at Deakin University in Victoria, Australia. He has studied and worked to conserve Australia’s ground-nesting, and especially beach-nesting birds for over two decades, using adaptive management approaches to improve their reproductive success and conservation status. Part of understanding the conservation ecology of a species involves understanding the threats species face, so Mike and his students also study Corvids, dogs and even humans! The basic ecology of these species also represents critical knowledge, and is an area of passionate research interest for Mike.
Ken Rogers studied physics at Kings College London University, and after a brief period as a nuclear physicist, worked in operational research in the UK, Iran, South Korea and Australia. He is an avid birdwatcher and bird ringer, with a particular interest in biometrics and moult.
Danny Rogers is an ornithologist at the Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research. For the past 15-20 years he has focussed largely on migratory shorebirds, undertaking field studies in north-western and south-eastern Australia and South Korea to
investigate how they select their habitat at a variety of spatial scales, and how they respond to change in a threatened flyway. His fascination with moults developed before then, and he worked for a decade on the Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds, with a team that used existing museum collections to put together the first descriptions of the moult cycles of most Australasian bird species.
All images © Mike Weston
Blog posts express the views of the individual author(s) and not those of the BOU.
Blog with #theBOUblog
If you want to write about your research in #theBOUblog, then please see here.