··

Please wait...

 
Blog

Early birds do not catch the “extra worm”

Pied Flycatchers do not gain more extra-pair paternity by arriving earlier

 
Barbara Mizumo Tomotani
Netherlands institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW)
 
Iván de la Hera
School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Ireland
 
 
LINKED PAPER
Early arrival is not associated with more extra-pair fertilizations in a long-distance migratory bird. Tomotani, B.M., Caglar, E., de la Hera, I., Mateman, A.C. & Visser, M.E. 2017. Journal of Avian Biology. DOI: 10.1111/jav.01317. VIEW

The timing of arrival is an important decision for a migratory bird. For example, if a male bird arrives early he can choose the best breeding territory and have more chances of obtaining a female. Indeed, early arriving males are known to benefit from an overall higher breeding success (Alatalo et al. 1984, Slagsvold 1986, Potti and Montalvo 1991, Canal et al. 2012, Velmala et al. 2015, among others). On the other hand, if they arrive too early, they may face very harsh early-spring conditions (e.g., Møller 1994, Brown and Brown 2000).

We carry out long term studies with a breeding population of European Pied Flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca, in the Hoge Veluwe National Park, the Netherlands, to investigate the effects of climate change on timing of annual cycle events. Climate change is known to affect when biological events happen; it is known, for example, to cause advancements in timing of breeding and migration in birds.

To understand the impacts of climate change, we need good measures of fitness to uncover whether the birds can respond and adapt to the rapid changes in their environment. Traditionally, fitness is measured by looking at the number of “recruits”, that is, the number of chicks that become breeding birds in the following year(s). There are other aspects, however, that contribute to the total fitness, and one of these is whether early males are also the ones with more cases of extra-pair paternity (henceforth “EPP”) (Langefors et al. 1998, Møller et al. 2003, Reudink et al. 2009, Cooper et al. 2011). Thus, we wanted to investigate if these early males also benefited from the “bonus” of achieving more EPP (or losing less paternity in their own nests). To discover that, we first observed the dates when male Pied Flycatchers arrived on their Dutch breeding site. We then sampled DNA from all males, females and offspring in order to assess how many chicks these males fostered in their own nests and in other males’ nests. So all birds were genotyped and this information was used to assign the paternity of all chicks to a male and a female.

Figure 1 a) In our study area, the Hoge Veluwe National Park, we offer around 400 nest boxes for cavity breeders. We score male arrival using plumage variation and colour rings. Males differ in size and shape of their forehead patch and plumage colour from b) female brown to c) various degrees of black. Later, when females arrive and choose their partners, we inspect nest boxes for nest building, egg laying and d) chick hatching. Chicks are later ringed and adults are caught to be identified. e) Chicks are measured and blood sampled when 12 days old © B. Tomotani & I. de la Hera

We found that if a male pairs with a female that lays her eggs early in the season, he will have an increased probability to gain EPP in another nest. However, his arrival date alone does not lead to the same pattern. This was a curious finding because early-arriving males also tend to have females that lay early. This seems to be caused by the large variation in the relation of male arrival and female egg-laying; in other words, early males may still end up with late egg-laying females and vice-versa, blurring any relation between male arrival and gains in EPP.

Figure 2 Probability of a male to obtain EPP in relation to the laying date of his social female (points correspond to the average probability of gaining paternity of all males that had females laying in each of the 4 day-bins starting from April day 23; point sizes reflect sample sizes: largest = 26, smallest = 1)

Figure 3 Laying date of the female and arrival date of the male (both given in April days)

Another curious finding of our study was related to the males that did not obtain a female during the season, the so-called “bachelors” (we also sampled them). As other studies reported (e.g., Potti and Montalvo 1991, Cooper et al. 2010), males that arrived late had a lower chance of attracting a female and, thus, risking not obtaining any paternity. However, we found out that sometimes a bachelor can obtain some paternity by fertilising an already-paired female. Thus, even if unable to settle their own nest, these bachelors might still father chicks.

Figure 4 Probability of fathering any egg in relation to the arrival date of the male. Points correspond to the average probability of losing paternity of all males that arrived in each of the 2 day-bins starting from April day 7, size of the symbols indicate sample size (largest = 13, smallest = 1). Open symbols represent males with at least one social nest. Closed symbols represent males without a social nest (bachelor males)

To conclude, our study does not support the hypothesis that early arriving males benefit from more EPP. On the contrary, it shows that the component of the male Pied Flycatcher phenology that affects the variation in EPP is the laying date of its female. Therefore, if we want to estimate fitness of arrival dates, our results should not be largely affected when information on EPP is not available.

 

References and further reading

Alatalo, R.V., Lundberg, A. & Ståhlbrandt, K. 1984. Female mate choice in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 14: 253–261. VIEW
 
Brown, C.R. & Brown, M.B. 2000. Weather-mediated natural selection on arrival time in Cliff Swallows (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 47: 339–345. VIEW
 
Canal, D., Jovani, R. & Potti, J. 2012a. Multiple mating opportunities boost protandry in a pied flycatcher population. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 66: 67–76. VIEW
 
Cooper, N.W., Murphy, M.T., Redmond, L.J. & Dolan, A.C. 2010. Reproductive correlates of spring arrival date in the Eastern Kingbird Tyrannus tyrannus. J. Ornithol. 152: 143–152. VIEW
 
Langefors, Å., Hasselquist, D. & von Schantz, T. 1998. Extra-pair fertilizations in the Sedge Warbler. J. Avian Biol. 29: 134–144. VIEW
 
Møller, A.P., Brohede, J., Cuervo, J.J., de Lope, F. & Primmer, C. 2003. Extrapair paternity in relation to sexual ornamentation, arrival date, and condition in a migratory bird. Behav. Ecol. 14: 707–712. VIEW
 
Potti, J. & Montalvo, S. 1991. Male arrival and female mate choice in Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca in Central Spain. Ornis Scand. 22: 45–54. VIEW
 
Reudink, M.W., Marra, P.P., Kyser, T.K., Boag, P.T., Langin, K.M. & Ratcliffe, L.M. 2009. Non-breeding season events influence sexual selection in a long-distance migratory bird. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 276: 1619–1626. VIEW
 
Slagsvold, T. 1986. Nest site settlement by the Pied Flycatcher: does the female choose her mate for the quality of his house or himself? Ornis Scand. 17: 210–220. VIEW
 
Velmala, W., Helle, S., Ahola, M.P., Klaassen, M., Lehikoinen, E., Rainio, K., Sirkiä, P.M. & Laaksonen, T. 2015. Natural selection for earlier male arrival to breeding grounds through direct and indirect effects in a migratory songbird. Ecol. Evol. 5: 1205–1213. VIEW

 
 

About the authors

Barbara M. Tomotani received her PhD at the Netherlands Institute of Ecology and University of Groningen. She is interested in the study of seasonal rhythms in vertebrates. In her PhD she investigated how different annual cycle stages of pied flycatchers are affected by climate change.
 
View Barbara’s full profile
 
Iván de la Hera is an ornithologist mainly interested in the evolution of avian life histories. Throughout his career, he has participated in a number of different research projects either as PhD student, postdoctoral researcher or field assistant. He is currently working at Cork (Ireland) in a project investigating the causes and consequences of variation in avian cognition.
 
View Iván’s full profile
 
 

Image credit

Top right: Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca hatchlings in nest © B. Tomotani & I. de la Hera
 

Blog posts express the views of the individual author(s) and not those of the BOU.

If you want to write about your research in #theBOUblog, then please see here.
 

Find us on . . .

Twitter | Facebook | Instagram

£0.000 items
Loading...