|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Home | About Us | Membership | Online Store | Conferences | The British List | Checklists | Ibis |
|||||||||||||||
BOU Register of Avian Thesis AbstractsJan A. van GilsForaging decisions in a digestively constrained long-distance migrant, the red knot (Calidris canutus)Institution: University of Groningen, the Netherlands Current Address: Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Centre for Limnology, Rijksstraatweg 6, 3631 AC Nieuwersluis, The Netherlands (Oct 2005) Subject Keywords: Digestive ecology, foraging, intertidal mudflats, migration, patch and prey choice, shellfish, shorebirds. Species Keywords: Red Knot Calidris canutus
Abstract: This thesis is about foraging decisions in red knots (Calidris canutus). During their non-breeding season, knots are found at intertidal mudflats, where they mainly feed on armoured mollusc prey, which they typically swallow whole! Among waders, knots possess a relatively large muscular gizzard, which allows them to crush their hard-shelled prey ‘internally’. This way of feeding comes at a price as large gizzards require large transport and maintenance costs. However, knots seem to have found a way out by flexibly reducing the size of their gizzard (and other nutritional organs) at times when feeding is impossible, such as during their long-distance flight (5,000-16,000 km) between their high-arctic breeding grounds and their coastal wintering grounds. However, such reductions (before departure) and enlargements (upon arrival) of the digestive system take time and therefore knots in their migratory period often have too small gizzards to (re)fuel at full speed. How red knots cope with this problem is the main theme of this work. Published Papers: Van Gils, J.A., Battley, P.F., Piersma, T. & Drent, R. 2005. Reinterpretation of gizzard sizes of red knots world-wide emphasises overriding importance of prey quality at migratory stopover sites. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B in press.Van Gils, J.A., De Rooij, S.R., Van Belle, J., Van der Meer, J., Dekinga, A., Piersma, T. & Drent, R. 2005. Digestive bottleneck affects foraging decisions in red knots (Calidris canutus). I. Prey choice. Journal of Animal Ecology 74:105-119. Van Gils, J.A., Dekinga, A., Spaans, B., Vahl, W.K. & Piersma, T. 2005. Digestive bottleneck affects foraging decisions in red knots (Calidris canutus). II. Patch choice and length of working day. Journal of Animal Ecology 74:120-130. Van Gils, J.A. & Piersma, T. 2004. Digestively constrained predators evade the cost of interference competition. Journal of Animal Ecology 73:386-398. Van Gils, J.A., Edelaar, P., Escudero, G. & Piersma, T. 2004. Carrying capacity models should not use fixed prey density thresholds: a plea for using more tools of behavioural ecology. Oikos 104:197-204. Piersma, T., Dekinga, A., Van Gils, J.A., Achterkamp, B. & Visser, G.H. 2003. Cost-benefit analysis of mollusc-eating in a shorebird. I. Foraging and processing costs estimated by the doubly labelled water method. Journal of Experimental Biology 206: 3361-3368. Van Gils, J.A., Piersma, T., Dekinga, A. & Dietz, M.W. 2003. Cost-benefit analysis of mollusc-eating in a shorebird. II. Optimizing gizzard size in the face of seasonal demands. Journal of Experimental Biology 206: 3369-3380. Van Gils, J.A., Schenk, I.W., Bos, O. & Piersma, T. 2003. Incompletely informed shorebirds that face a digestive constraint maximize net energy gain when exploiting patches. American Naturalist 161:777-793. |
||||||||||||||||
|
BOU, PO Box 417, Peterborough PE7 3FX, UK
|
||||||||||||||||